arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:math/9603219 [math.LO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

The consistency of 2^{aleph_{0}}> aleph_{omega} + I(aleph_{2})=I(aleph_{omega})

Martin Gilchrist, Saharon Shelah

Published 1996-03-15Version 1

An omega-coloring is a pair <f,B> where f:[B]^{2} ---> omega. The set B is the field of f and denoted Fld(f). Let f,g be omega-colorings. We say that f realizes the coloring g if there is a one-one function k:Fld(g) ---> Fld(f) such that for all {x,y}, {u,v} in dom(g) we have f({k(x),k(y)}) not= f({k(u),k(v)}) => g({x,y}) not= g({u,v}). We write f~g if f realizes g and g realizes f. We call the ~-classes of omega-colorings with finite fields identities. We say that an identity I is of size r if |Fld(f)|=r for some/all f in I. For a cardinal kappa and f:[kappa]^2 ---> omega we define I(f) to be the collection of identities realized by f and I (kappa) to be bigcap {I(f)| f:[kappa]^2 ---> omega}. We show that, if ZFC is consistent then ZFC + 2^{aleph_0}> aleph_omega + I(aleph_2)=I(aleph_omega) is consistent.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:math/9308212 [math.LO] (Published 1993-08-15)
On CH + 2^{aleph_1}-> (alpha)^2_2 for alpha < omega_2
arXiv:1503.01406 [math.LO] (Published 2015-03-04)
NF is Consistent
arXiv:math/9710216 [math.LO] (Published 1997-10-15)
Consistency of partition relation for cardinal in (lambda,2^lambda)