arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:math/9209205 [math.LO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Perfect sets of random reals

Jörg Brendle, Haim Judah

Published 1992-09-15Version 1

We discuss the relationship between perfect sets of random reals, dominating reals, and the product of two copies of the random algebra B. Recall that B is the algebra of Borel sets of 2^omega modulo the null sets. Also given two models M subseteq N of ZFC, we say that g in omega^omega cap N is a dominating real over M iff forall f in omega^omega cap M there is m in omega such that forall n geq m (g(n) > f(n)); and r in 2^omega cap N is random over M iff r avoids all Borel null sets coded in M iff r is determined by some filter which is B-generic over M. We show that there is a ccc partial order P which adds a perfect set of random reals without adding a dominating real, thus answering a question asked by the second author in joint work with T. Bartoszynski and S. Shelah some time ago. The method of the proof of this result yields also that B times B does not add a dominating real. By a different argument we show that B times B does not add a perfect set of random reals (this answers a question that A. Miller asked during the logic year at MSRI).

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1702.00172 [math.LO] (Published 2017-02-01)
Adding a lot of random reals by adding a few
arXiv:math/0310438 [math.LO] (Published 2003-10-28)
Ultrafilters with property (s)
arXiv:1408.2171 [math.LO] (Published 2014-08-10)
Low for random reals and positive-measure domination