arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:math/0310438 [math.LO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Ultrafilters with property (s)

Arnold W. Miller

Published 2003-10-28Version 1

A set X which is a subset of the Cantor set has property (s) (Marczewski (Spzilrajn)) iff for every perfect set P there exists a perfect set Q contained in P such that Q is a subset of X or Q is disjoint from X. Suppose U is a nonprincipal ultrafilter on omega. It is not difficult to see that if U is preserved by Sacks forcing, i.e., it generates an ultrafilter in the generic extension after forcing with the partial order of perfect sets, then U has property (s) in the ground model. It is known that selective ultrafilters or even P-points are preserved by Sacks forcing. On the other hand (answering a question raised by Hrusak) we show that assuming CH (or more generally MA for ctble posets) there exists an ultrafilter U with property (s) such that U does not generate an ultrafilter in any extension which adds a new subset of omega. http://www.math.wisc.edu/~miller/res/index.html miller@math.wisc.edu

Comments: LaTeX2e 10 pages
Categories: math.LO
Subjects: 03E35, 03E17, 03E50
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:0801.1912 [math.LO] (Published 2008-01-12)
Large cardinals and gap-1 morasses
arXiv:1411.0084 [math.LO] (Published 2014-11-01)
On embedding certain partial orders into the P-points under RK and Tukey reducibility
arXiv:1405.7456 [math.LO] (Published 2014-05-29, updated 2014-12-10)
Computable structures in generic extensions