arXiv:math/0612234 [math.LO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources
Recursive definitions on surreal numbers
Published 2006-12-09Version 1
Let No be Conway's class of surreal numbers. I will make explicit the notion of a function f on No recursively defined over some family of functions. Under some "tameness" and uniformity condition, f must satisfy some interesting properties; in particular, the supremum of the class of element greater or equal to a fixed d in No is actually an element of No. For similar reasons, the concatenation function x:y cannot be defined recursively in a uniform way over polynomial functions.
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1503.00315 [math.LO] (Published 2015-03-01)
Surreal numbers, derivations and transseries
arXiv:1512.02267 [math.LO] (Published 2015-12-07)
The surreal numbers as a universal H-field
arXiv:1711.06936 [math.LO] (Published 2017-11-18)
On numbers, germs, and transseries