arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:2012.10606 [math.MG]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

How to define your dimension: A discourse on Hausdorff dimension and self-similarity

Satvik Singh

Published 2020-12-19Version 1

One often distinguishes between a line and a plane by saying that the former is one-dimensional while the latter is two. But, what does it mean for an object to have $d-$dimensions? Can we define a consistent notion of dimension rigorously for arbitrary objects, say a snowflake, perhaps? And must the dimension always be integer-valued? After highlighting some crucial problems that one encounters while defining a sensible notion of dimension for a certain class of objects, we attempt to answer the above questions by exploring the concept of Hausdorff dimension -- a remarkable method of assigning dimension to subsets of arbitrary metric spaces. In order to properly formulate the definition and properties of the Hausdorff dimension, we review the critical measure-theoretic terminology beforehand. Finally, we discuss the notion of self-similarity and show how it often defies our quotidian intuition that dimension must always be integer-valued.

Comments: This article aims to provide a light and accessible introduction to the basics of dimension theory and self-similarity
Categories: math.MG, math.HO
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:2208.12687 [math.MG] (Published 2022-08-26)
Hausdorff dimension of Besicovitch sets of Cantor graphs
arXiv:math/0202215 [math.MG] (Published 2002-02-21)
Hausdorff dimension of the set of extreme points of a self-similar set
arXiv:math/0305193 [math.MG] (Published 2003-05-14)
On entropy and Hausdorff dimension of measures defined through a non-homogeneous Markov process