arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1809.09879 [math.PR]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Learning random points from geometric graphs or orderings

Josep Diaz, Colin McDiarmid, Dieter Mitsche

Published 2018-09-26Version 1

Suppose that there is a family of $n$ random points $X_v$ for $v \in V$, independently and uniformly distributed in the square $\left[-\sqrt{n}/2,\sqrt{n}/2\right]^2$. We do not see these points, but learn about them in one of the following two ways. Suppose first that we are given the corresponding random geometric graph $G$, where distinct vertices $u$ and $v$ are adjacent when the Euclidean distance $d_E(X_u,X_v)$ is at most $r$. Assume that the threshold distance $r$ satisfies $n^{3/14} \ll r \ll n^{1/2}$. We shall see that the following holds with high probability. Given the graph $G$ (without any geometric information), in polynomial time we can approximately reconstruct the hidden embedding, in the sense that, `up to symmetries', for each vertex $v$ we find a point within distance about $r$ of $X_v$; that is, we find an embedding with `displacement' at most about $r$. Now suppose that, instead of being given the graph $G$, we are given, for each vertex $v$, the ordering of the other vertices by increasing Euclidean distance from $v$. Then, with high probability, in polynomial time we can find an embedding with the much smaller displacement error $O(\sqrt{\log n})$.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1412.3743 [math.PR] (Published 2014-12-11)
Euclidean distance between Haar orthogonal and gaussian matrices
arXiv:0902.1156 [math.PR] (Published 2009-02-06, updated 2012-08-10)
On the spread of random graphs
arXiv:1407.2860 [math.PR] (Published 2014-07-10, updated 2014-12-23)
Increasing subsequences of random walks