arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1803.10543 [math.LO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

The Worm Calculus

Ana de Almeida Borges, Joost J. Joosten

Published 2018-03-28, updated 2019-06-18Version 2

We present a propositional modal logic $\sf WC$, which includes a logical $verum$ constant $\top$ but does not have any propositional variables. Furthermore, the only connectives in the language of $\sf WC$ are consistency-operators $\langle \alpha \rangle$ for each ordinal $\alpha$. As such, we end up with a class-size logic. However, for all practical purposes, we can consider restrictions of $\sf WC$ up to a given ordinal. Given the restrictive signature of the language, the only formulas are iterated consistency statements, which are called worms. The theorems of $\sf WC$ are all of the form $A \vdash B$ for worms $A$ and $B$. The main result of the paper says that the well-known strictly positive logic $\sf RC$, called Reflection Calculus, is a conservative extension of $\sf WC$. As such, our result is important since it is the ultimate step in stripping spurious complexity off the polymodal provability logic $\sf{GLP}$, as far as applications to ordinal analyses are concerned. Indeed, it may come as a surprise that a logic as weak as $\sf WC$ serves the purpose of computing something as technically involved as the proof theoretical ordinals of formal mathematical theories.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1501.05327 [math.LO] (Published 2015-01-21)
Turing jumps through provability
arXiv:1804.10452 [math.LO] (Published 2018-04-27)
A Finitely Supported Frame for the Turing Schmerl Calculus
arXiv:1412.4439 [math.LO] (Published 2014-12-15)
On Elementary Theories of GLP-Algebras