{ "id": "1803.10543", "version": "v2", "published": "2018-03-28T11:45:33.000Z", "updated": "2019-06-18T16:47:08.000Z", "title": "The Worm Calculus", "authors": [ "Ana de Almeida Borges", "Joost J. Joosten" ], "journal": "Advances in Modal Logic 12 (2018) 13-27", "categories": [ "math.LO" ], "abstract": "We present a propositional modal logic $\\sf WC$, which includes a logical $verum$ constant $\\top$ but does not have any propositional variables. Furthermore, the only connectives in the language of $\\sf WC$ are consistency-operators $\\langle \\alpha \\rangle$ for each ordinal $\\alpha$. As such, we end up with a class-size logic. However, for all practical purposes, we can consider restrictions of $\\sf WC$ up to a given ordinal. Given the restrictive signature of the language, the only formulas are iterated consistency statements, which are called worms. The theorems of $\\sf WC$ are all of the form $A \\vdash B$ for worms $A$ and $B$. The main result of the paper says that the well-known strictly positive logic $\\sf RC$, called Reflection Calculus, is a conservative extension of $\\sf WC$. As such, our result is important since it is the ultimate step in stripping spurious complexity off the polymodal provability logic $\\sf{GLP}$, as far as applications to ordinal analyses are concerned. Indeed, it may come as a surprise that a logic as weak as $\\sf WC$ serves the purpose of computing something as technically involved as the proof theoretical ordinals of formal mathematical theories.", "revisions": [ { "version": "v2", "updated": "2019-06-18T16:47:08.000Z" } ], "analyses": { "keywords": [ "worm calculus", "propositional modal logic", "polymodal provability logic", "propositional variables", "iterated consistency statements" ], "tags": [ "journal article" ], "note": { "typesetting": "TeX", "pages": 0, "language": "en", "license": "arXiv", "status": "editable" } } }