arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1710.04067 [astro-ph.SR]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

H$α$ and H$β$ emission in a C3.3 solar flare: comparison between observations and simulations

Vincenzo Capparelli, Francesca Zuccarello, Paolo Romano, Paulo J. A. Simoes, Lyndsay Fletcher, David Kuridze, Mihalis Mathioudakis, Peter H. Keys, Gianna Cauzzi, Mats Carlsson

Published 2017-10-11Version 1

The Hydrogen Balmer series is a basic radiative loss channel from the flaring solar chromosphere. We report here on the analysis of an extremely rare set of simultaneous observations of a solar flare in the H${\alpha}$ and H${\beta}$ lines at high spatial and temporal resolution, which were acquired at the Dunn Solar Telescope. Images of the C3.3 flare (SOL2014-04-22T15:22) made at various wavelengths along the H${\alpha}$ line profile by the Interferometric Bidimensional Spectrometer (IBIS) and in the H${\beta}$ with the Rapid Oscillations in the Solar Atmosphere (ROSA) broadband imager are analyzed to obtain the intensity evolution. The H${\alpha}$ and H${\beta}$ intensity excesses in three identified flare footpoints are well correlated in time. We examine the ratio of H${\alpha}$ to H${\beta}$ flare excess, which was proposed by previous authors as a possible diagnostic of the level of electron beam energy input. In the stronger footpoints, the typical value of the the H${\alpha}$/H${\beta}$ intensity ratio observed is $\sim 0.4-0.5$, in broad agreement with values obtained from a RADYN non-LTE simulation driven by an electron beam with parameters constrained (as far as possible) by observation. The weaker footpoint has a larger H${\alpha}$/H${\beta}$ ratio, again consistent with a RADYN simulation but with a smaller energy flux. The H${\alpha}$ line profiles observed have a less prominent central reversal than is predicted by the RADYN results, but can be brought into agreement if the H${\alpha}$-emitting material has a filling factor of around 0.2--0.3.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1404.3257 [astro-ph.SR] (Published 2014-04-12)
Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation of the X2.2 Solar Flare on 2011 February 15: I. Comparison with the Observations
arXiv:1409.4869 [astro-ph.SR] (Published 2014-09-17)
Improved magnetogram calibration of SMFT and its comparison with the HMI
arXiv:1004.4150 [astro-ph.SR] (Published 2010-04-23)
Charged-Particle Thermonuclear Reaction Rates: IV. Comparison to Previous Work