arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1409.4869 [astro-ph.SR]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Improved magnetogram calibration of SMFT and its comparison with the HMI

Xianyong Bai, Yuanyong Deng, Fei Teng, Jiangtao Su, Xinjie Mao, Guoping Wang

Published 2014-09-17Version 1

In this paper, we try to improve the magnetogram calibration method of the Solar Magnetic Field Telescope (SMFT). The improved calibration process fits the observed full Stokes information, using six points on the profile of Fe {\i} 5324.18 {\AA} line, and the analytical Stokes profiles under the Milne-Eddington atmosphere model, adopting the Levenberg-Marquardt least-square fitting algorithm. In Comparison with the linear calibration methods, which employs one point, there is large difference in the strength of longitudinal field $B_l$ and tranverse field $B_t$, caused by the non-linear relationship, but the discrepancy is little in the case of inclination and azimuth. We conclude that it is better to deal with the non-linear effects in the calibration of $B_l$ and $B_t$ using six points. Moreover, in comparison with SDO/HMI, SMFT has larger stray light and acquires less magnetic field strength. For vector magnetic fields in two sunspot regions, the magnetic field strength, inclination and azimuth angles between SMFT and HMI are roughly in agrement, with the linear fitted slope of 0.73/0.7, 0.95/1.04 and 0.99/1.1. In the case of pores and quiet regions ($B_l$ $<$ 600 G), the fitted slopes of the longitudinal magnetic field strength are 0.78 and 0.87 respectively.

Comments: 8 pages, 9 figures, Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Categories: astro-ph.SR
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1004.4150 [astro-ph.SR] (Published 2010-04-23)
Charged-Particle Thermonuclear Reaction Rates: IV. Comparison to Previous Work
arXiv:1205.0571 [astro-ph.SR] (Published 2012-05-02)
The locations of SNe Ib/c and their comparison to those of WR stars and GRBs
arXiv:1307.8158 [astro-ph.SR] (Published 2013-07-30)
A different nature between the radio AXPs in comparison to the others SGRs/AXPs