arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1402.6817 [math.CO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Lower bounds on maximal determinants of binary matrices via the probabilistic method

Richard P. Brent, Judy-anne H. Osborn, Warren D. Smith

Published 2014-02-27, updated 2015-01-26Version 3

Let $D(n)$ be the maximal determinant for $n \times n$ $\{\pm 1\}$-matrices, and ${\mathcal R}(n) = D(n)/n^{n/2}$ be the ratio of $D(n)$ to the Hadamard upper bound. We give several new lower bounds on ${\mathcal R}(n)$ in terms of $d$, where $n = h+d$, $h$ is the order of a Hadamard matrix, and $h$ is maximal subject to $h \le n$. A relatively simple bound is \[{\mathcal R}(n) \ge \left(\frac{2}{\pi e}\right)^{d/2} \left(1 - d^2\left(\frac{\pi}{2h}\right)^{1/2}\right) \;\text{ for all }\; n \ge 1.\] An asymptotically sharper bound is \[{\mathcal R}(n) \ge \left(\frac{2}{\pi e}\right)^{d/2} \exp\left(d\left(\frac{\pi}{2h}\right)^{1/2} + \; O\left(\frac{d^{5/3}}{h^{2/3}}\right)\right).\] We also show that \[{\mathcal R}(n) \ge \left(\frac{2}{\pi e}\right)^{d/2}\] if $n \ge n_0$ and $n_0$ is sufficiently large, the threshold $n_0$ being independent of $d$, or for all $n\ge 1$ if $0 \le d \le 3$ (which would follow from the Hadamard conjecture). The proofs depend on the probabilistic method, and generalise previous results that were restricted to the cases $d=0$ and $d=1$.

Comments: 37 pages, 2 tables, 59 references. Added some references in v2, fixed typo in v3
Categories: math.CO
Subjects: 05B20, 05D40, 15A15, 15B34
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1211.3248 [math.CO] (Published 2012-11-14, updated 2013-05-05)
Lower bounds on maximal determinants of +-1 matrices via the probabilistic method
arXiv:1501.06235 [math.CO] (Published 2015-01-26)
Probabilistic lower bounds on maximal determinants of binary matrices
arXiv:1208.3330 [math.CO] (Published 2012-08-16, updated 2012-09-14)
Bounds on minors of binary matrices