arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1306.0449 [math.LO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

On supercompactness and the continuum function

Brent Cody, Menachem Magidor

Published 2013-06-03, updated 2013-09-11Version 3

Given a cardinal $\kappa$ that is $\lambda$-supercompact for some regular cardinal $\lambda\geq\kappa$ and assuming $\GCH$, we show that one can force the continuum function to agree with any function $F:[\kappa,\lambda]\cap\REG\to\CARD$ satisfying $\forall\alpha,\beta\in\dom(F)$ $\alpha<\cf(F(\alpha))$ and $\alpha<\beta$ $\implies$ $F(\alpha)\leq F(\beta)$, while preserving the $\lambda$-supercompactness of $\kappa$ from a hypothesis that is of the weakest possible consistency strength, namely, from the hypothesis that there is an elementary embedding $j:V\to M$ with critical point $\kappa$ such that $M^\lambda\subseteq M$ and $j(\kappa)>F(\lambda)$. Our argument extends Woodin's technique of surgically modifying a generic filter to a new case: Woodin's key lemma applies when modifications are done on the range of $j$, whereas our argument uses a new key lemma to handle modifications done off of the range of $j$ on the ghost coordinates. This work answers a question of Friedman and Honzik [FH2012]. We also discuss several related open questions.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1209.1136 [math.LO] (Published 2012-09-05)
Some results on large cardinals and the continuum function
arXiv:1311.0303 [math.LO] (Published 2013-11-01)
Easton functions and supercompactness
arXiv:1904.01815 [math.LO] (Published 2019-04-03)
On supercompactness of $ω_1$