J. S. W. Claeys, S. Toonen, N. Mennekens
Published 2012-11-05Version 1
We compare the results of three binary population synthesis codes to understand the differences in their results. As a first result we find that when equalizing the assumptions the results are similar. The main differences arise from deviating physical input.
Comments: 2 pages, Proceedings of the conference: "370 Years of Astronomy in Utrecht"
Improved magnetogram calibration of SMFT and its comparison with the HMI
A Comparison of Explosion Energies for Simulated and Observed Core-Collapse Supernovae
Charged-Particle Thermonuclear Reaction Rates: IV. Comparison to Previous Work
![QR code for arXiv:1211.0809 [astro-ph.SR]](http://oss.arxitics.com/images/favicon.svg)