arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:quant-ph/0408191AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

What is wrong with von Neumann's theorem on "no hidden variables"

Elemer E Rosinger

Published 2004-08-31, updated 2004-09-16Version 2

It is shown that, although correct mathematically, the celebrated 1932 theorem of von Neumann which is often interpreted as proving the impossibility of the existence of "hidden variables" in Quantum Mechanics, is in fact based on an assumption which is physically not reasonable. Apart from that, the alleged conclusion of von Neumann proving the impossibility of the existence of "hidden variables" was already set aside in 1952 by the counterexample of the possibility of a physical theory, such as given by what is usually called the "Bohmian Mechanics". Similar arguments apply to other two well known mathematical theorems, namely, of Gleason, and of Kochen and Specker, which have often been seen as equally proving the impossibility of the existence of "hidden variables" in Quantum Mechanics.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:quant-ph/0506040 (Published 2005-06-06, updated 2005-06-07)
Hidden variables in quantum mechanics: Generic models, set-theoretic forcing, and the emergence of probability
arXiv:quant-ph/0703071 (Published 2007-03-08, updated 2007-03-14)
Quantum nonlocality without hidden variables: An algorithmic approach
arXiv:1210.4262 [quant-ph] (Published 2012-10-16)
Dynamics and Hidden Variables