arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:quant-ph/0406166AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements

R. W. Spekkens

Published 2004-06-23, updated 2005-03-18Version 3

An operational definition of contextuality is introduced which generalizes the standard notion in three ways: (1) it applies to arbitrary operational theories rather than just quantum theory, (2) it applies to arbitrary experimental procedures, rather than just sharp measurements, and (3) it applies to a broad class of ontological models of quantum theory, rather than just deterministic hidden variable models. We derive three no-go theorems for ontological models, each based on an assumption of noncontextuality for a different sort of experimental procedure; one for preparation procedures, another for unsharp measurement procedures (that is, measurement procedures associated with positive-operator valued measures), and a third for transformation procedures. All three proofs apply to two-dimensional Hilbert spaces, and are therefore stronger than traditional proofs of contextuality.

Comments: 16 pages, REVTEX, comments welcome
Journal: Phys. Rev. A 71, 052108 (2005)
Categories: quant-ph
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1108.5261 [quant-ph] (Published 2011-08-26, updated 2012-05-08)
On the limits of quantum theory: contextuality and the quantum-classical cut
arXiv:1411.2244 [quant-ph] (Published 2014-11-09)
Contextuality in Generalized Klyachko-type, Bell-type, and Leggett-Garg-type Systems
arXiv:0709.4266 [quant-ph] (Published 2007-09-26)
Ontological models and the interpretation of contextuality