arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:math/0412263 [math.PR]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Minimal spanning forests

Russell Lyons, Yuval Peres, Oded Schramm

Published 2004-12-13, updated 2006-11-20Version 5

Minimal spanning forests on infinite graphs are weak limits of minimal spanning trees from finite subgraphs. These limits can be taken with free or wired boundary conditions and are denoted FMSF (free minimal spanning forest) and WMSF (wired minimal spanning forest), respectively. The WMSF is also the union of the trees that arise from invasion percolation started at all vertices. We show that on any Cayley graph where critical percolation has no infinite clusters, all the component trees in the WMSF have one end a.s. In $\mathbb{Z}^d$ this was proved by Alexander [Ann. Probab. 23 (1995) 87--104], but a different method is needed for the nonamenable case. We also prove that the WMSF components are ``thin'' in a different sense, namely, on any graph, each component tree in the WMSF has $p_{\mathrm{c}}=1$ a.s., where $p_{\mathrm{c}}$ denotes the critical probability for having an infinite cluster in Bernoulli percolation. On the other hand, the FMSF is shown to be ``thick'': on any connected graph, the union of the FMSF and independent Bernoulli percolation (with arbitrarily small parameter) is a.s. connected. In conjunction with a recent result of Gaboriau, this implies that in any Cayley graph, the expected degree of the FMSF is at least the expected degree of the FSF (the weak limit of uniform spanning trees). We also show that the number of infinite clusters for Bernoulli($p_{\mathrm{u}}$) percolation is at most the number of components of the FMSF, where $p_{\mathrm{u}}$ denotes the critical probability for having a unique infinite cluster. Finally, an example is given to show that the minimal spanning tree measure does not have negative associations.

Comments: Published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/009117906000000269 in the Annals of Probability (http://www.imstat.org/aop/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org)
Journal: AnnalsProbab.34:1665-1692,2006
Categories: math.PR, math-ph, math.MP
Subjects: 60B99, 60K35, 82B43, 60D05, 20F65
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:math/9811170 [math.PR] (Published 1998-11-29, updated 1999-05-02)
Indistinguishability of Percolation Clusters
arXiv:1601.04945 [math.PR] (Published 2016-01-19)
On the capacity functional of the infinite cluster of a Boolean model
arXiv:0708.4287 [math.PR] (Published 2007-08-31, updated 2008-03-27)
Dynamical sensitivity of the infinite cluster in critical percolation