arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:math/0404240 [math.LO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

The pair $(\aleph_n,\aleph_0)$ may fail $\aleph_0$--compactness

Saharon Shelah

Published 2004-04-13Version 1

Let P be a distinguished unary predicate and K= {M: M a model of cardinality aleph_n with P^M of cardinality aleph_0}. We prove that consistently for n=4, for some countable first order theory T we have: T has no model in K whereas every finite subset of T has a model in K. We then show how we prove it also for n=2, too.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1406.5980 [math.LO] (Published 2014-06-23, updated 2014-08-28)
Tameness and frames revisited
arXiv:math/9204219 [math.LO] (Published 1992-04-15)
Uniformization and the diversity of Whitehead groups
arXiv:1704.04751 [math.LO] (Published 2017-04-16)
Compactness of maximal eventually different families