arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:math/0304198 [math.CO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Dense graphs are antimagic

N. Alon, G. Kaplan, A. Lev, Y. Roditty, R. Yuster

Published 2003-04-15Version 1

An {\em antimagic labeling} of a graph with $m$ edges and $n$ vertices is a bijection from the set of edges to the integers $1,...,m$ such that all $n$ vertex sums are pairwise distinct, where a vertex sum is the sum of labels of all edges incident with the same vertex. A graph is called {\em antimagic} if it has an antimagic labeling. A conjecture of Ringel (see \cite{HaRi}) states that every connected graph, but $K_2$, is antimagic. Our main result validates this conjecture for graphs having minimum degree $\Omega(\log n)$. The proof combines probabilistic arguments with simple tools from analytic number theory and combinatorial techniques. We also prove that complete partite graphs (but $K_2$) and graphs with maximum degree at least $n-2$ are antimagic.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:math/0603106 [math.CO] (Published 2006-03-04)
Lattice Grids and Prisms are Antimagic
arXiv:1110.3490 [math.CO] (Published 2011-10-16, updated 2013-03-08)
On perfect packings in dense graphs
arXiv:1812.06715 [math.CO] (Published 2018-12-17)
Caterpillars are Antimagic