arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:gr-qc/0510072AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment

Clifford M. Will

Published 2005-10-16, updated 2006-04-04Version 2

The status of experimental tests of general relativity and of theoretical frameworks for analysing them is reviewed. Einstein's equivalence principle (EEP) is well supported by experiments such as the Eotvos experiment, tests of special relativity, and the gravitational redshift experiment. Future tests of EEP and of the inverse square law are searching for new interactions arising from unification or quantum gravity. Tests of general relativity at the post-Newtonian level have reached high precision, including the light deflection, the Shapiro time delay, the perihelion advance of Mercury, and the Nordtvedt effect in lunar motion. Gravitational-wave damping has been detected in an amount that agrees with general relativity to better than half a percent using the Hulse-Taylor binary pulsar, and other binary pulsar systems have yielded other tests, especially of strong-field effects. When direct observation of gravitational radiation from astrophysical sources begins, new tests of general relativity will be possible.

Comments: 89 pages, 8 figures; an update of the Living Review article originally published in 2001; final published version incorporating referees' suggestions
Journal: LivingRev.Rel.9:3,2005
Categories: gr-qc
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:gr-qc/0103036 (Published 2001-03-12)
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc] (Published 2014-03-28)
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
arXiv:gr-qc/9811036 (Published 1998-11-11)
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment: A 1998 Update