Keith Slevin, Tomi Ohtsuki
Published 2001-06-01Version 1
In a recent submission to this archive arXiv:cond-mat/0105325, Suslov has claimed that our recent numerical estimate of the critical exponent of the Anderson transition $\nu=1.57\pm.02$ is in error and that the available numerical data are consistent with a value of $\nu=1$. We contest this claim and demonstrate using Suslov's own scaling procedure that $\nu\ne 1$
Critical Exponent of the Anderson Transition using Massively Parallel Supercomputing
The critical exponent of the localization length at the Anderson transition in 3D disordered systems is larger than 1
Symmetry Theory of the Anderson Transition
