arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:2502.04929 [astro-ph.CO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Robustness of Dark Energy Phenomenology Across Different Parameterizations

William J. Wolf, Carlos García-García, Pedro G. Ferreira

Published 2025-02-07Version 1

The recent evidence for dynamical dark energy from DESI, in combination with other cosmological data, has generated significant interest in understanding the nature of dark energy and its underlying microphysics. However, interpreting these results critically depends on how dark energy is parameterized. This paper examines the robustness of conclusions about the viability of particular kinds of dynamical dark energy models to the choice of parameterization, focusing on four popular two-parameter families: the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL), Jassal-Bagla-Padmanabhan (JBP), Barboza-Alcaniz (BA), and exponential (EXP) parameterizations. We find that conclusions regarding the viability of minimally and non-minimally coupled quintessence models are independent of the parameterization adopted. We demonstrate this both by mapping these dark energy models into the $(w_0, w_a)$ parameter space defined by these various parameterizations and by showing that all of these parameterizations can equivalently account for the phenomenology predicted by these dark energy models to a high degree of accuracy.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:0904.4007 [astro-ph.CO] (Published 2009-04-26, updated 2009-10-22)
Roles of dark energy perturbations in the dynamical dark energy models: Can we ignore them?
arXiv:1210.4239 [astro-ph.CO] (Published 2012-10-16, updated 2013-01-25)
Testing for dynamical dark energy models with redshift-space distortions
arXiv:1801.08553 [astro-ph.CO] (Published 2018-01-25)
Constraints on the sum of the neutrino masses in dynamical dark energy models with $w(z) \geq -1$ are tighter than those obtained in $Λ$CDM