arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:2410.09694 [math.NT]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Matsuda monoids and Artin's primitive root conjecture

Sunil Naik

Published 2024-10-13Version 1

Let $M \subseteq \mathbb{N}_{0}$ be the additive submonoid generated by $2$ and $3$. In a recent work, Christensen, Gipson and Kulosman proved that $M$ is not a Matsuda monoid of type $2$ and type $3$ and they have raised the question of whether $M$ is a Matsuda monoid of type $\ell$ for any prime $\ell$. Assuming the generalized Riemann hypothesis, Daileda showed that $M$ is not a Matsuda monoid of type $\ell$ for any prime $\ell$. In this article, we will establish this result unconditionally using its' connection with Artin's primitive root conjecture and this resolves the question of Christensen, Gipson and Kulosman.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:math/0412262 [math.NT] (Published 2004-12-13, updated 2012-08-08)
Artin's primitive root conjecture -a survey -
arXiv:2107.12121 [math.NT] (Published 2021-07-26)
On some symmetries of the base $ n $ expansion of $ 1/m $ : Comments on Artin's Primitive root conjecture
arXiv:2202.11329 [math.NT] (Published 2022-02-23)
Unified treatment of Artin-type problems