arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:2409.11110 [cs.CV]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Quantitative Evaluation of MILs' Reliability For WSIs Classification

Hassan Keshvarikhojasteh

Published 2024-09-17Version 1

Reliable models are dependable and provide predictions acceptable given basic domain knowledge. Therefore, it is critical to develop and deploy reliable models, especially for healthcare applications. However, Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) models designed for Whole Slide Images (WSIs) classification in computational pathology are not evaluated in terms of reliability. Hence, in this paper we compare the reliability of MIL models with three suggested metrics and use three region-wise annotated datasets. We find the mean pooling instance (MEAN-POOL-INS) model more reliable than other networks despite its naive architecture design and computation efficiency. The code to reproduce the results is accessible at https://github.com/tueimage/MILs'R .

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:2210.06776 [cs.CV] (Published 2022-10-13)
Improving the Reliability for Confidence Estimation
arXiv:1602.01940 [cs.CV] (Published 2016-02-05)
Automatic and Quantitative evaluation of attribute discovery methods
arXiv:1808.09411 [cs.CV] (Published 2018-08-28)
Quantitative Evaluation of Base and Detail Decomposition Filters Based on their Artifacts