arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:2403.12216 [math.GT]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Stein fillings vs. Milnor fibers

R. Inanc Baykur, A. Nemethi, O. Plamenevskaya

Published 2024-03-18Version 1

Given a link of a normal surface singularity with its canonical contact structure, we compare the collection of its Stein fillings to its Milnor fillings (that is, Milnor fibers of possible smoothings). We prove that, unlike Stein fillings, Milnor fillings of a given link have bounded topology; for links of sandwiched singularities, we further establish that there are only finitely many Milnor fillings. We discuss some other obstructions for a Stein filling to be represented by a Milnor fiber, and for various types of singularities, including simple classes like cusps and triangle singularities, we produce Stein fillings that do not come from Milnor fibers or resolutions. Meanwhile, we discover that there are many contact 3-manifolds that admit infinitely many Stein fillings but do not admit arbitrarily large ones.

Comments: Appendix A by O. Plamenevskaya and L. Starkston
Categories: math.GT, math.AG, math.SG
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1206.3874 [math.GT] (Published 2012-06-18, updated 2014-04-01)
Canonical contact structures on some singularity links
arXiv:1510.03770 [math.GT] (Published 2015-10-13)
On Betti Numbers of Milnor Fiber of Hyperplane Arrangements
arXiv:1908.00782 [math.GT] (Published 2019-08-02)
Hypersurface singularities and virtually overtwisted contact structures