arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:2401.14483 [cs.LG]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Four Facets of Forecast Felicity: Calibration, Predictiveness, Randomness and Regret

Rabanus Derr, Robert C. Williamson

Published 2024-01-25Version 1

Machine learning is about forecasting. Forecasts, however, obtain their usefulness only through their evaluation. Machine learning has traditionally focused on types of losses and their corresponding regret. Currently, the machine learning community regained interest in calibration. In this work, we show the conceptual equivalence of calibration and regret in evaluating forecasts. We frame the evaluation problem as a game between a forecaster, a gambler and nature. Putting intuitive restrictions on gambler and forecaster, calibration and regret naturally fall out of the framework. In addition, this game links evaluation of forecasts to randomness of outcomes. Random outcomes with respect to forecasts are equivalent to good forecasts with respect to outcomes. We call those dual aspects, calibration and regret, predictiveness and randomness, the four facets of forecast felicity.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:2005.10039 [cs.LG] (Published 2020-05-20)
The Effects of Randomness on the Stability of Node Embeddings
arXiv:1709.02012 [cs.LG] (Published 2017-09-06)
On Fairness and Calibration
arXiv:1909.02827 [cs.LG] (Published 2019-09-06)
Master your Metrics with Calibration