arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:2308.08384 [cond-mat.stat-mech]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Availability, storage capacity, and diffusion: Stationary states of an asymmetric exclusion process connected to two reservoirs

Sourav Pal, Parna Roy, Abhik Basu

Published 2023-08-16Version 1

We explore how the interplay of finite availability, carrying capacity of particles at different parts of a spatially extended system and particle diffusion between them control the steady state currents and density profiles in a one-dimensional current-carrying channel connecting the different parts of the system. To study this, we construct a minimal model consisting of two particle reservoirs of finite carrying capacities connected by a totally asymmetric simple exclusion process (TASEP). In addition to particle transport via TASEP between the reservoirs, the latter can also directly exchange particles, modeling particle diffusion between them that can maintain a steady current in the system. We investigate the steady state density profiles and the associated particle currents in the TASEP lane. The resulting phases and the phase diagrams are quite different from an open TASEP, and are characterised by the model parameters defining particle exchanges between the TASEP and the reservoirs, direct particle exchanges between the reservoirs, and the filling fraction of the particles that determines the total resources available. These parameters can be tuned to make the density on the TASEP lane globally uniform or piecewise continuous, and can make the two reservoirs preferentially populated or depopulated.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
Distributed fixed resources exchanging particles: Phases of an asymmetric exclusion process connected to two reservoirs
arXiv:0801.1563 [cond-mat.stat-mech] (Published 2008-01-10)
Characteristics of the asymmetric simple exclusion process in the presence of quenched spatial disorder
arXiv:cond-mat/0001295 (Published 2000-01-20)
Asymmetric exclusion process with next-nearest-neighbor interaction: some comments on traffic flow and a nonequilibrium reentrance transition