arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:2307.02071 [cs.LG]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

A Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for Data with High-Cardinality Categorical Variables

Fabio Sigrist

Published 2023-07-05Version 1

High-cardinality categorical variables are variables for which the number of different levels is large relative to the sample size of a data set, or in other words, there are few data points per level. Machine learning methods can have difficulties with high-cardinality variables. In this article, we empirically compare several versions of two of the most successful machine learning methods, tree-boosting and deep neural networks, and linear mixed effects models using multiple tabular data sets with high-cardinality categorical variables. We find that, first, machine learning models with random effects have higher prediction accuracy than their classical counterparts without random effects, and, second, tree-boosting with random effects outperforms deep neural networks with random effects.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:2009.09756 [cs.LG] (Published 2020-09-21)
Demand Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods and Stacked Generalization
arXiv:2209.04643 [cs.LG] (Published 2022-09-10)
Examining stability of machine learning methods for predicting dementia at early phases of the disease
arXiv:1407.7417 [cs.LG] (Published 2014-07-28)
'Almost Sure' Chaotic Properties of Machine Learning Methods