arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:2305.06676 [math.LO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Does $\mathsf{DC}$ imply $\mathsf{AC}_ω$, uniformly?

Alessandro Andretta, Lorenzo Notaro

Published 2023-05-11Version 1

The Axiom of Dependent Choice $\mathsf{DC}$ and the Axiom of Countable Choice $\mathsf{AC}_\omega$ are two weak forms of the Axiom of Choice that can be stated for a specific set: $\mathsf{DC}(X)$ asserts that any total binary relation on $X$ has an infinite chain, while $\mathsf{AC}_\omega (X)$ asserts that any countable collection of nonempty subsets of $X$ has a choice function. It is well-known that $\mathsf{DC} \Rightarrow \mathsf{AC}_\omega$. We study for which sets and under which hypotheses $\mathsf{DC}(X) \Rightarrow \mathsf{AC}_\omega (X)$, and then we show it is consistent with $\mathsf{ZF}$ that there is a set $A \subseteq \mathbb{R}$ for which $\mathsf{DC} (A)$ holds, but $\mathsf{AC}_\omega (A)$ fails.

Comments: 23 pages, to be submitted
Categories: math.LO
Subjects: 03E25, 03E35, 03E40
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1806.04077 [math.LO] (Published 2018-06-11)
Dependent Choice, Properness, and Generic Absoluteness
arXiv:2405.10466 [math.LO] (Published 2024-05-16)
Maximal δ-separated sets in separable metric spaces and weak forms of choice
arXiv:1003.2477 [math.LO] (Published 2010-03-12)
Splitting stationary sets from weak forms of Choice