arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:2204.05336 [astro-ph.HE]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Numerical relativity simulations of the neutron star merger GW190425: microphysics and mass ratio effects

A. Camilletti, L. Chiesa, G. Ricigliano, A. Perego, L. C. Lippold, S. Padamata, S. Bernuzzi, D. Radice, D. Logoteta, F. M. Guercilena

Published 2022-04-11Version 1

GW190425 was the second gravitational wave (GW) signal compatible with a binary neutron star (BNS) merger detected by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors. Despite intense follow-up campaigns, no electromagnetic counterpart was identified. Whether the associated kilonova was too dim or the localisation area too broad is still an open question. We simulate 28 BNS mergers with the chirp mass of GW190425 and spanning a mass ratio $1 \leq q \leq 1.67$, using numerical-relativity simulations with finite temperature, composition dependent nuclear equation of state (EOS) and neutrino radiation. The energy emitted in GWs is $\lesssim 0.083 M_{\odot} c^2$ with a peak luminosity of $1.1-2.4 \times 10^{58} {\rm erg~s^{-1}}/(1+q)^2$. Dynamical ejecta and disc mass are relatively small, the former ranging between $5 \times 10^{-6}$ and $\sim 10^{-3}~M_{\odot}$ and the latter between $10^{-5}$ and $0.1~M_{\odot}$. Asymmetric mergers, especially in the case of stiff EOS, are able to unbind more matter and to form heavier discs compared to equal mass binaries. The angular momentum of the disc is $8-10 M_{\odot}~GM_{\rm disc}/c$ over three orders of magnitude in $M_{\rm disc}$. While the associated nucleosynthesis shows no peculiarity, the simulated kilonovae are relatively dim compared with the GW170817 event. In particular, for distances compatible with GW190425, we find AB magnitudes always dimmer than $\sim20~{\rm mag}$ for the $B$, $r$ and $K$ bands, with brighter kilonovae associated to more asymmetric binaries and stiffer EOS. We suggest that, even assuming a good coverage of GW190425's sky location, the kilonova signal could hardly have been detected by present wide-field surveys and no firm constraints on the binary parameters or neutron star (NS) EOS can be argued from the lack of the detection.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:2011.11110 [astro-ph.HE] (Published 2020-11-22)
Mapping dynamical ejecta and disk masses from numerical relativity simulations of neutron star mergers
arXiv:2111.05183 [astro-ph.HE] (Published 2021-11-09)
Numerical relativity simulations of prompt collapse mergers: threshold mass and phenomenological constraints on neutron star properties after GW170817
arXiv:1303.0837 [astro-ph.HE] (Published 2013-03-04)
Numerical Relativity Simulations of Magnetized Black Hole-Neutron Star Mergers