arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:2202.11664 [physics.flu-dyn]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Comparative analysis of machine learning methods for active flow control

Fabio Pino, Lorenzo Schena, Jean Rabault, Alexander Kuhnle, Miguel . A. Mendez

Published 2022-02-23Version 1

Machine learning frameworks such as Genetic Programming (GP) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) are gaining popularity in flow control. This work presents a comparative analysis of the two, bench-marking some of their most representative algorithms against global optimization techniques such as Bayesian Optimization (BO) and Lipschitz global optimization (LIPO). First, we review the general framework of the flow control problem, linking optimal control theory with model-free machine learning methods. Then, we test the control algorithms on three test cases. These are (1) the stabilization of a nonlinear dynamical system featuring frequency cross-talk, (2) the wave cancellation from a Burgers' flow and (3) the drag reduction in a cylinder wake flow. Although the control of these problems has been tackled in the recent literature with one method or the other, we present a comprehensive comparison to illustrate their differences in exploration versus exploitation and their balance between `model capacity' in the control law definition versus `required complexity'. We believe that such a comparison opens the path towards hybridization of the various methods, and we offer some perspective on their future development in the literature of flow control problems.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:2301.04998 [physics.flu-dyn] (Published 2023-01-12)
Machine learning methods for prediction of breakthrough curves in reactive porous media
arXiv:2204.11719 [physics.flu-dyn] (Published 2022-04-25)
On the Performance of Machine Learning Methods for Breakthrough Curve Prediction
arXiv:2309.02462 [physics.flu-dyn] (Published 2023-09-04)
Active flow control for three-dimensional cylinders through deep reinforcement learning