arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:2202.05088 [math.CO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Substructures in Latin squares

Matthew Kwan, Ashwin Sah, Mehtaab Sawhney, Michael Simkin

Published 2022-02-10Version 1

We prove several results about substructures in Latin squares. First, we explain how to adapt our recent work on high-girth Steiner triple systems to the setting of Latin squares, resolving a conjecture of Linial that there exist Latin squares with arbitrarily high girth. As a consequence, we see that the number of order-$n$ Latin squares with no intercalate (i.e., no $2\times2$ Latin subsquare) is at least $(e^{-9/4}n-o(n))^{n^{2}}$. Equivalently, $\Pr\left[\mathbf{N}=0\right]\ge e^{-n^{2}/4- (n^{2})}=e^{-(1+o(1))\mathbb{E}\mathbf{N}}$, where $\mathbf{N}$ is the number of intercalates in a uniformly random order-$n$ Latin square. In fact, extending recent work of Kwan, Sah, and Sawhney, we resolve the general large-deviation problem for intercalates in random Latin squares, up to constant factors in the exponent: for any constant $0<\delta\le1$ we have $\Pr[\mathbf{N}\le(1-\delta)\mathbb{E}\mathbf{N}]=\exp(-\Theta(n^{2}))$ and for any constant $\delta>0$ we have $\Pr[\mathbf{N}\ge(1+\delta)\mathbb{E}\mathbf{N}]=\exp(-\Theta(n^{4/3}(\log n)^{2/3}))$. Finally, we show that in almost all order-$n$ Latin squares, the number of cuboctahedra (i.e., the number of pairs of possibly degenerate $2\times2$ subsquares with the same arrangement of symbols) is of order $n^{4}$, which is the minimum possible. As observed by Gowers and Long, this number can be interpreted as measuring "how associative" the quasigroup associated with the Latin square is.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:2201.04554 [math.CO] (Published 2022-01-12, updated 2022-01-16)
High-Girth Steiner Triple Systems
arXiv:1307.3582 [math.CO] (Published 2013-07-12)
Random Latin squares and 2-dimensional expanders
arXiv:2106.11932 [math.CO] (Published 2021-06-22)
Large deviations in random latin squares