arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:2112.13684 [math.RT]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Calogero-Moser spaces vs unipotent representations

Cédric Bonnafé

Published 2021-12-23, updated 2022-01-12Version 2

Lusztig's classification of unipotent representations of finite reductive groups depends only on the associated Weyl group $W$ (endowed with its Frobenius automorphism). All the structural questions (families, Harish-Chandra series, partition into blocks...) have an answer in a combinatorics that can be entirely built directly from $W$. Over the years, we have noticed that the same combinatorics seems to be encoded in the Poisson geometry of a Calogero-Moser space associated with $W$ (roughly speaking, families correspond to ${\mathbb{C}}^\times$-fixed points, Harish-Chandra series correspond to symplectic leaves, blocks correspond to symplectic leaves in the fixed point subvariety under the action of a root of unity). The aim of this survey is to gather all these observations, state precise conjectures and provide general facts and examples supporting these conjectures.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:2112.12405 [math.RT] (Published 2021-12-23, updated 2022-01-12)
Automorphisms and symplectic leaves of Calogero-Moser spaces
arXiv:2101.04578 [math.RT] (Published 2021-01-12)
Toward the endoscopic classification of unipotent representations of $p$-adic $G_2$
arXiv:2005.02438 [math.RT] (Published 2020-05-05)
Arthur packets for $G_2$ and perverse sheaves on cubics