arXiv:2104.07927 [math.CO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources
Induced subgraphs of graphs with large chromatic number. XIV. Excluding a biclique and an induced tree
Alex Scott, Paul Seymour, Sophie Spirkl
Published 2021-04-16Version 1
Let H be a tree. It was proved by Rodl that graphs that do not contain H as an induced subgraph, and do not contain the complete bipartite graph $K_{t,t}$ as a subgraph, have bounded chromatic number. Kierstead and Penrice strengthened this, showing that such graphs have bounded degeneracy. Here we give a further strengthening, proving that for every tree H, the degeneracy is at most polynomial in t. This answers a question of Bonamy, Pilipczuk, Rzazewski, Thomasse and Walczak.
Categories: math.CO
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1804.04787 [math.CO] (Published 2018-04-13)
Unavoidable Subtournaments in Tournaments with Large Chromatic Number
arXiv:1702.04313 [math.CO] (Published 2017-02-14)
Terminal-Pairability in Complete Bipartite Graphs
arXiv:1905.01874 [math.CO] (Published 2019-05-06)
On the bar visibility number of complete bipartite graphs