arXiv:2011.11294 [math.NA]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources
Numerical validation of probabilistic laws to evaluate finite element error estimates
Joel Chaskalovic, Franck Assous
Published 2020-11-23Version 1
We propose a numerical validation of a probabilistic approach applied to estimate the relative accuracy between two Lagrange finite elements $P_k$ and $P_m, (k<m)$. In particular, we show practical cases where finite element $P_{k}$ gives more accurate results than finite element $P_{m}$. This illustrates the theoretical probabilistic framework we recently derived in order to evaluate the actual accuracy. This also highlights the importance of the extra caution required when comparing two numerical methods, since the classical results of error estimates concerns only the asymptotic convergence rate.
Comments: 15 pages, 11 figures
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1901.06821 [math.NA] (Published 2019-01-21)
Explicit $k-$dependency for $P_k$ finite elements in $W^{m,p}$ error estimates: application to probabilistic laws for accuracy analysis
arXiv:2011.11298 [math.NA] (Published 2020-11-23)
Generalized Beta Prime Distribution Applied to Finite Element Error Approximation
A new probabilistic interpretation of Bramble-Hilbert lemma