arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:2006.14466 [math.CO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Splits with forbidden subgraphs

Maria Axenovich, Ryan R. Martin

Published 2020-06-25Version 1

In this note, we fix a graph $H$ and ask into how many vertices can each vertex of a clique of size $n$ can be "split" such that the resulting graph is $H$-free. Formally: A graph is an $(n,k)$-graph if its vertex sets is a pairwise disjoint union of $n$ parts of size at most $k$ each such that there is an edge between any two distinct parts. Let $$ f(n,H) = \min \{k \in \mathbb N : \mbox{there is an $(n,k)$-graph $G$ such that $H\not\subseteq G$}\} . $$ Barbanera and Ueckerdt observed that $f(n, H)=2$ for any graph $H$ that is not bipartite. If a graph $H$ is bipartite and has a well-defined Tur\'an exponent, i.e., ${\rm ex}(n, H) = \Theta(n^r)$ for some $r$, we show that $\Omega (n^{2/r -1}) = f(n, H) = O (n^{2/r-1} \log ^{1/r} n)$. We extend this result to all bipartite graphs for which an upper and a lower Tur\'an exponents do not differ by much. In addition, we prove that $f(n, K_{2,t}) =\Theta(n^{1/3})$ for any fixed $t$.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:math/0405001 [math.CO] (Published 2004-04-30)
Degree powers in graphs with forbidden subgraphs
arXiv:1502.01502 [math.CO] (Published 2015-02-05)
Forbidden subgraphs in the norm graph
arXiv:1602.00922 [math.CO] (Published 2016-02-02)
Rainbow vertex-connection and forbidden subgraphs