arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:2006.10508 [math.LO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Interpretability in PRA

Marta Bílková, Dick de Jongh, Joost J. Joosten

Published 2020-06-18Version 1

In this paper from 2009 we study IL(PRA), the interpretability logic of PRA. As PRA is neither an essentially reflexive theory nor finitely axiomatizable, the two known arithmetical completeness results do not apply to PRA: IL(PRA) is not ILM or ILP. IL(PRA) does of course contain all the principles known to be part of IL(All), the interpretability logic of the principles common to all reasonable arithmetical theories. In this paper, we take two arithmetical properties of PRA and see what their consequences in the modal logic IL(PRA) are. These properties are reflected in the so-called Beklemishev Principle B, and Zambella's Principle Z, neither of which is a part of IL(All). Both principles and their interrelation are submitted to a modal study. In particular, we prove a frame condition for B. Moreover, we prove that Z follows from a restricted form of B. Finally, we give an overview of the known relationships of IL(PRA) to important other interpetability principles.

Journal: Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (2), 128-138; 2009
Categories: math.LO
Subjects: 03F30, 03B45, 03F30, 03B45, 03F30, 03F45
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1710.05599 [math.LO] (Published 2017-10-16)
Complexity of the interpretability logic IL
arXiv:1605.05612 [math.LO] (Published 2016-05-18)
Labelled tableaux for interpretability logics
arXiv:2004.03813 [math.LO] (Published 2020-04-08)
Modal completeness of sublogics of the interpretability logic $\mathbf{IL}$