arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:2002.10400 [cs.LG]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Closing the convergence gap of SGD without replacement

Shashank Rajput, Anant Gupta, Dimitris Papailiopoulos

Published 2020-02-24Version 1

Stochastic gradient descent without replacement sampling is widely used in practice for model training. However, the vast majority of SGD analyses assumes data sampled with replacement, and when the function minimized is strongly convex, an $\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{T}\right)$ rate can be established when SGD is run for $T$ iterations. A recent line of breakthrough work on SGD without replacement (SGDo) established an $\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{n}{T^2}\right)$ convergence rate when the function minimized is strongly convex and is a sum of $n$ smooth functions, and an $\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{T^2}+\frac{n^3}{T^3}\right)$ rate for sums of quadratics. On the other hand, the tightest known lower bound postulates an $\Omega\left(\frac{1}{T^2}+\frac{n^2}{T^3}\right)$ rate, leaving open the possibility of better SGDo convergence rates in the general case. In this paper, we close this gap and show that SGD without replacement achieves a rate of $\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{T^2}+\frac{n^2}{T^3}\right)$ when the sum of the functions is a quadratic, and offer a new lower bound of $\Omega\left(\frac{n}{T^2}\right)$ for strongly convex functions that are sums of smooth functions.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:2007.03479 [cs.LG] (Published 2020-07-07)
Dynamic Regret of Convex and Smooth Functions
arXiv:2002.09067 [cs.LG] (Published 2020-02-21)
Incremental Sampling Without Replacement for Sequence Models
arXiv:2007.06744 [cs.LG] (Published 2020-07-14)
WOR and $p$'s: Sketches for $\ell_p$-Sampling Without Replacement