arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:2001.03831 [cs.CV]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

A Comparative Study for Non-rigid Image Registration and Rigid Image Registration

Xiaoran Zhang, Hexiang Dong, Di Gao, Xiao Zhao

Published 2020-01-12Version 1

Image registration algorithms can be generally categorized into two groups: non-rigid and rigid. Recently, many deep learning-based algorithms employ a neural net to characterize non-rigid image registration function. However, do they always perform better? In this study, we compare the state-of-art deep learning-based non-rigid registration approach with rigid registration approach. The data is generated from Kaggle Dog vs Cat Competition \url{https://www.kaggle.com/c/dogs-vs-cats/} and we test the algorithms' performance on rigid transformation including translation, rotation, scaling, shearing and pixelwise non-rigid transformation. The Voxelmorph is trained on rigidset and nonrigidset separately for comparison and we also add a gaussian blur layer to its original architecture to improve registration performance. The best quantitative results in both root-mean-square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) metrics for rigid registration are produced by SimpleElastix and non-rigid registration by Voxelmorph. We select representative samples for visual assessment.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1002.1148 [cs.CV] (Published 2010-02-05)
A Comparative Study of Removal Noise from Remote Sensing Image
arXiv:2302.04584 [cs.CV] (Published 2023-02-09)
Complex Network for Complex Problems: A comparative study of CNN and Complex-valued CNN
arXiv:2408.13561 [cs.CV] (Published 2024-08-24)
Variational Autoencoder for Anomaly Detection: A Comparative Study