arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1908.02319 [math.OC]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Tight-and-cheap conic relaxation for the AC optimal power flow problem

Christian Bingane, Miguel F. Anjos, Sébastien Le Digabel

Published 2019-08-06Version 1

The classical alternating current optimal power flow problem is highly nonconvex and generally hard to solve. Convex relaxations, in particular semidefinite, second-order cone, convex quadratic, and linear relaxations, have recently attracted significant interest. The semidefinite relaxation is the strongest among them and is exact for many cases. However, the computational efficiency for solving large-scale semidefinite optimization is lower than for second-order cone optimization. We propose a conic relaxation obtained by combining semidefinite optimization with the reformulation-linearization technique, commonly known as RLT. The proposed relaxation is stronger than the second-order cone relaxation and nearly as tight as the standard semidefinite relaxation. Computational experiments using standard test cases with up to 6515 buses show that the time to solve the new conic relaxation is up to one order of magnitude lower than for the chordal relaxation, a semidefinite relaxation technique that exploits the sparsity of power networks.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1803.06984 [math.OC] (Published 2018-03-19)
Robust Optimization and Control for Electricity Generation and Transmission
arXiv:1703.03050 [math.OC] (Published 2017-03-08)
Matrix Minor Reformulation and SOCP-based Spatial Branch-and-Cut Method for the AC Optimal Power Flow Problem
arXiv:2502.06978 [math.OC] (Published 2025-02-10)
Dual Conic Proxy for Semidefinite Relaxation of AC Optimal Power Flow