arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1908.01108 [math.CO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Improved bounds for induced poset saturation

Ryan R. Martin, Heather C. Smith, Shanise Walker

Published 2019-08-03Version 1

Given a finite poset $\mathcal{P}$, a family $\mathcal{F}$ of elements in the Boolean lattice is induced-$\mathcal{P}$-saturated if $\mathcal{F}$ contains no copy of $\mathcal{P}$ as an induced subposet but every proper superset of $\mathcal{F}$ contains a copy of $\mathcal{P}$ as an induced subposet. The minimum size of an induced-$\mathcal{P}$-saturated family in the $n$-dimensional Boolean lattice, denoted $\operatorname{sat}^*(n,\mathcal{P})$, was first studied by Ferrara et al. (2017). Our work focuses on strengthening lower bounds. For the 4-point poset known as the diamond, we prove $\operatorname{sat}^*(n,\mathcal{D}_2)\geq\sqrt{n}$, improving upon a logarithmic lower bound. For the antichain with $k+1$ elements, we prove $\operatorname{sat}^*(n,\mathcal{A}_{k+1})\geq (1-o_k(1))\frac{kn}{\log_2 k}$, improving upon a lower bound of $3n-1$ for $k\geq 3$.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1205.1501 [math.CO] (Published 2012-05-07, updated 2012-11-10)
On diamond-free subposets of the Boolean lattice
arXiv:1701.03010 [math.CO] (Published 2017-01-11)
The Saturation Number of Induced Subposets of the Boolean Lattice
arXiv:1408.0646 [math.CO] (Published 2014-08-04)
Set families with forbidden subposets