arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1907.12212 [math.PR]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Phase Transitions of Best-of-Two and Best-of-Three on Stochastic Block Models

Nobutaka Shimizu, Takeharu Shiraga

Published 2019-07-29Version 1

This paper is concerned with voting processes on graphs where each vertex holds one of two different opinions. In particular, we study the \emph{Best-of-two} and the \emph{Best-of-three}. Here at each synchronous and discrete time step, each vertex updates its opinion to match the majority among the opinions of two random neighbors and itself (the Best-of-two) or the opinions of three random neighbors (the Best-of-three). Previous studies have explored these processes on complete graphs and expander graphs, but we understand significantly less about their properties on graphs with more complicated structures. In this paper, we study the Best-of-two and the Best-of-three on the stochastic block model $G(2n,p,q)$, which is a random graph consisting of two distinct Erd\H{o}s-R\'enyi graphs $G(n,p)$ joined by random edges with density $q\leq p$. We obtain two main results. First, if $p=\omega(\log n/n)$ and $r=q/p$ is a constant, we show that there is a phase transition in $r$ with threshold $r^*$ (specifically, $r^*=\sqrt{5}-2$ for the Best-of-two, and $r^*=1/7$ for the Best-of-three). If $r>r^*$, the process reaches consensus within $O(\log \log n+\log n/\log (np))$ steps for any initial opinion configuration with a bias of $\Omega(n)$. By contrast, if $r<r^*$, then there exists an initial opinion configuration with a bias of $\Omega(n)$ from which the process requires at least $2^{\Omega(n)}$ steps to reach consensus. Second, if $p$ is a constant and $r>r^*$, we show that, for any initial opinion configuration, the process reaches consensus within $O(\log n)$ steps. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result concerning multiple-choice voting for arbitrary initial opinion configurations on non-complete graphs.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1312.7862 [math.PR] (Published 2013-12-30)
Phase transition for finite-speed detection among moving particles
arXiv:math/0401071 [math.PR] (Published 2004-01-08)
Random subgraphs of finite graphs: III. The phase transition for the $n$-cube
arXiv:math/0504589 [math.PR] (Published 2005-04-29, updated 2006-06-20)
The phase transition in inhomogeneous random graphs