arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1905.08425 [math.LO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

The weakness of the pigeonhole principle under hyperarithmetical reductions

Benoit Monin, Ludovic Patey

Published 2019-05-21Version 1

The infinite pigeonhole principle for 2-partitions ($\mathsf{RT}^1_2$) asserts the existence, for every set $A$, of an infinite subset of $A$ or of its complement. In this paper, we study the infinite pigeonhole principle from a computability-theoretic viewpoint. We prove in particular that $\mathsf{RT}^1_2$ admits strong cone avoidance for arithmetical and hyperarithmetical reductions. We also prove the existence, for every $\Delta^0_n$ set, of an infinite low${}_n$ subset of it or its complement. This answers a question of Wang. For this, we design a new notion of forcing which generalizes the first and second-jump control of Cholak, Jockusch and Slaman.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1803.09771 [math.LO] (Published 2018-03-26, updated 2018-07-17)
Pigeons do not jump high
arXiv:2011.03386 [math.LO] (Published 2020-11-06)
Computing sets from all infinite subsets
arXiv:1602.03784 [math.LO] (Published 2016-02-11)
$\mathsf{RT}_2^2$ does not imply $\mathsf{WKL}_0$