arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1904.06260 [cs.LG]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Similarities between policy gradient methods (PGM) in Reinforcement learning (RL) and supervised learning (SL)

Eric Benhamou

Published 2019-04-12Version 1

Reinforcement learning (RL) is about sequential decision making and is traditionally opposed to supervised learning (SL) and unsupervised learning (USL). In RL, given the current state, the agent makes a decision that may influence the next state as opposed to SL (and USL) where, the next state remains the same, regardless of the decisions taken, either in batch or online learning. Although this difference is fundamental between SL and RL, there are connections that have been overlooked. In particular, we prove in this paper that gradient policy method can be cast as a supervised learning problem where true label are replaced with discounted rewards. We provide a new proof of policy gradient methods (PGM) that emphasizes the tight link with the cross entropy and supervised learning. We provide a simple experiment where we interchange label and pseudo rewards. We conclude that other relationships with SL could be made if we modify the reward functions wisely.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:2010.05380 [cs.LG] (Published 2020-10-12)
Efficient Wasserstein Natural Gradients for Reinforcement Learning
arXiv:1810.02525 [cs.LG] (Published 2018-10-05)
Where Did My Optimum Go?: An Empirical Analysis of Gradient Descent Optimization in Policy Gradient Methods
arXiv:1912.05104 [cs.LG] (Published 2019-12-11)
Entropy Regularization with Discounted Future State Distribution in Policy Gradient Methods