arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1806.06247 [physics.flu-dyn]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Turbulence theory by machine

Javier Jimenez

Published 2018-06-16Version 1

The question of whether significant sub-volumes of a turbulent flow can be identified by automatic means, independently of a-priori assumptions, is addressed using the example of two-dimensional decaying turbulence. Significance is defined as influence on the future evolution of the flow, and the problem is cast as an unsupervised machine `game' in which the rules are the Navier--Stokes equations. It is shown that significance is an intermittent quantity for this flow, and that, in accordance with previous intuition, the most significant features are vortices, while the least significant ones are dominated by strain. Subject to cost considerations, the method should be applicable to more general turbulent flows.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1507.01124 [physics.flu-dyn] (Published 2015-07-04)
Comments on turbulence theory by Qian and by Edwards and McComb
arXiv:0806.4530 [physics.flu-dyn] (Published 2008-06-27)
Inverse kinetic theory approach to turbulence theory
arXiv:1610.05975 [physics.flu-dyn] (Published 2016-10-19)
New scenario of turbulence theory and wall-bounded turbulence: Theoretical significance