arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1707.01475 [cs.LG]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Complex and Holographic Embeddings of Knowledge Graphs: A Comparison

Théo Trouillon, Maximilian Nickel

Published 2017-07-05Version 1

Embeddings of knowledge graphs have received significant attention due to their excellent performance for tasks like link prediction and entity resolution. In this short paper, we are providing a comparison of two state-of-the-art knowledge graph embeddings for which their equivalence has recently been established, i.e., ComplEx and HolE [Nickel, Rosasco, and Poggio, 2016; Trouillon et al., 2016; Hayashi and Shimbo, 2017]. First, we briefly review both models and discuss how their scoring functions are equivalent. We then analyze the discrepancy of results reported in the original articles, and show experimentally that they are likely due to the use of different loss functions. In further experiments, we evaluate the ability of both models to embed symmetric and antisymmetric patterns. Finally, we discuss advantages and disadvantages of both models and under which conditions one would be preferable to the other.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:2307.02973 [cs.LG] (Published 2023-07-06)
Pruning vs Quantization: Which is Better?
arXiv:2007.14166 [cs.LG] (Published 2020-07-28)
A Comparison of Optimization Algorithms for Deep Learning
arXiv:2303.00890 [cs.LG] (Published 2023-03-02, updated 2023-07-11)
Comparison of High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization Algorithms on BBOB