arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1702.05783 [math.PR]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Connections between the liberation of projections and its counterpart for symmetries

Tarek Hamdi

Published 2017-02-19Version 1

We present here some connections between the liberation process for projections $(P,Q)\mapsto(P,U_tQU_t^*)$ and its counterpart $(R,S)\mapsto(R,U_tSU_t^*)$ for symmetries when the projections $\{P,Q\}$ and the symmetries $\{R,S\}$ are associated, where $U_t$ is a free unitary Brownian motion freely independent from $\{P,Q\}$ (and so $\{R,S\}$). We relate the moments of their actions on the operators $X_t:=PU_tQU_t^*$ and $Y_t:=U_tRU_t^*S$ and use this to prove a relationship between the corresponding spectral measures (hereafter $\mu_t$ and $\nu_t$). On the other hand, we focus in the process of unitary random variables $Y_t$ in the case of arbitrary trace values $\tau(R),\tau(S)$. More precisely, we use stochastic calculus to derive a partial differential equation (PDE for short) for its Herglotz transform and use it to develop subordination results in terms of L\"owner equations. The paper is closed with an improved proof of $i^*\left( \mathbb{C}P+\mathbb{C}(I-P); \mathbb{C}Q+\mathbb{C}(I-Q) \right)=-\chi_{orb}\left(P,Q\right)$ as an application.

Comments: All comments are welcome
Categories: math.PR
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1806.00266 [math.PR] (Published 2018-06-01)
Projections of spherical Brownian motion
arXiv:1609.01003 [math.PR] (Published 2016-09-05)
Connections in randomly oriented graphs
arXiv:1606.08692 [math.PR] (Published 2016-06-28)
Generalized immediate exchange models and their symmetries