Soumik Adhikary, V. Ravishankar, Radha Pyari Sandhir
Published 2016-08-18Version 1
A critique of a prescription of non-locality in [Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4418 (2000)], [Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 040404 (2002)], [Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 130404 (2004)] that appears to be stronger and more general than the Bell-CHSH formulation is presented. It is shown that, contrary to expectations, this prescription fails to correctly identify a large family of maximally non-local Bell states.
Comments: 5 pages, 3 figures
More nonlocality with less incompatibility in higher dimensions: Bell vs prepare-measure scenarios
Quantum Law of Motion: Analysis and Extension to Higher Dimensions
Rational Extension of Anisotropic Harmonic Oscillator Potentials in Higher Dimensions
![QR code for arXiv:1608.05324 [quant-ph]](http://oss.arxitics.com/images/favicon.svg)