arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1601.02234 [math.CO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Hypo-efficient domination and hypo-unique domination

Vladimir Samodivkin

Published 2016-01-10Version 1

For a graph $G$ let $\gamma (G)$ be its domination number. We define a graph G to be (i) a hypo-efficient domination graph (or a hypo-$\mathcal{ED}$ graph) if $G$ has no efficient dominating set (EDS) but every graph formed by removing a single vertex from $G$ has at least one EDS, and (ii) a hypo-unique domination graph (a hypo-$\mathcal{UD}$ graph) if $G$ has at least two minimum dominating sets,but $G-v$ has a unique minimum dominating set for each $v\in V(G)$. We show that each hypo-$\mathcal{UD}$ graph $G$ of order at least $3$ is connected and $\gamma(G-v) < \gamma(G)$ for all $v \in V(G)$. We obtain a tight upper bound on the order of a hypo-$\mathcal{P}$ graph in terms of the domination number and maximum degree of the graph, where $\mathcal{P} \in \{\mathcal{UD}, \mathcal{ED}\}$. Families of circulant graphs which achieve these bounds are presented. We also prove that the bondage number of any hypo-$\mathcal{UD}$ graph is not more than the minimum degree plus one.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1502.06245 [math.CO] (Published 2015-02-22)
Changing of the domination number of a graph: edge multisubdivision and edge removal
arXiv:2008.12601 [math.CO] (Published 2020-08-28)
New bounds on domination and independence in graphs
arXiv:1603.07398 [math.CO] (Published 2016-03-24)
Domination number in block designs