arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1601.01509 [cond-mat.stat-mech]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

On the dispute between Boltzmann and Gibbs entropy

Pierfrancesco Buonsante, Roberto Franzosi, Augusto Smerzi

Published 2016-01-07Version 1

Very recently, the validity of the concept of negative temperature has been challenged by several authors since they consider Boltzmann's entropy (that allows negative temperatures) inconsistent from a mathematical and statistical point of view, whereas they consider Gibbs' entropy (that does not admit negative temperatures) the correct definition for microcanonical entropy. In the present paper we prove that for systems with equivalence of the statistical ensembles Boltzmann entropy is the correct microcanonical entropy. Analytical results on two systems supporting negative temperatures, confirm the scenario we propose. In addition, we corroborate our proof by numeric simulations on an explicit lattice system showing that negative temperature equilibrium states are accessible and obey standard statistical mechanics prevision.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:cond-mat/0311211 (Published 2003-11-10)
Microcanonical entropy for small magnetisations
arXiv:cond-mat/0401532 (Published 2004-01-27)
Gibbs Entropy and Irreversibility
Inconsistency of microcanonical entropy: the case of chemical potential