arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1512.05976 [math.CO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

The uniqueness of a distance-regular graph with intersection array {32,27,8,1;1,4,27,32} and related results

Leonard H. Soicher

Published 2015-12-18Version 1

It is known that, up to isomorphism, there is a unique distance-regular graph $\Delta$ with intersection array {32,27;1,12} (equivalently, $\Delta$ is the unique strongly regular graph with parameters (105,32,4,12)). Here we investigate the distance-regular antipodal covers of $\Delta$. We show that, up to isomorphism, there is just one distance-regular antipodal triple cover of $\Delta$ (a graph $\hat\Delta$ discovered by the author over twenty years ago), proving that there is a unique distance-regular graph with intersection array {32,27,8,1;1,4,27,32}. In the process, we confirm an unpublished result of Steve Linton that there is no distance-regular antipodal double cover of $\Delta$, and so no distance-regular graph with intersection array {32,27,6,1;1,6,27,32}. We also show there is no distance-regular antipodal 4-cover of $\Delta$, and so no distance-regular graph with intersection array {32,27,9,1;1,3,27,32}, and that there is no distance-regular antipodal 6-cover of $\Delta$ that is a double cover of $\hat\Delta$.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1011.4581 [math.CO] (Published 2010-11-20)
There exists no distance-regular graph with intersection array {56,36,9;1,3,48}
arXiv:2010.13443 [math.CO] (Published 2020-10-26)
Moore graph with parameters (3250,57,0,1) does not exist
arXiv:1205.1431 [math.CO] (Published 2012-05-07, updated 2018-10-16)
The uniqueness of a generalized quadrangle of order (4,16)